Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In support of the grounded nature of discourse-level comprehension, encouraging children to immerse themselves in a story’s content has been found to improve their performance on reading comprehension measures. The current study explored the long-term benefits of two immersive strategies, storyboard construction (SC) and active experiencing (AE), on children’s (9-10 year olds) overall comprehension of narrative texts. At the beginning of the year, one third of participants learned how to use SC (the active recreation of a story using plastic cut-outs), one third learned how to use AE (to act out a story using emotional expression and movement) and one third participated in a session with no specific training. After training, participants read two short stories, using their respective strategy, and then answered a combination of emotion-based and spatial-based comprehension questions. We found that children who used AE performed better on emotion-based questions and children who used SC performed better on spatial-based questions. The benefits did not persist when children used imagery-based versions of the strategies with novel stories. The differential benefits of the two strategies support the grounded, multi-dimensional nature of children’s mental representations of narrative texts.