Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Universal moral codes prohibit harming others for personal gain. Previous work has identified brain networks and neuromodulator systems involved in moral decision-making, but how these systems compute and shape moral values remains unknown. Here I will describe a novel experimental framework for examining the neurocomputational basis of moral decisions in humans. We invite participants to trade off profits for themselves against pain for either themselves or another person, and build computational models to quantify the relative values they ascribe to pain for themselves and others. Across several experiments we find that most people would rather harm themselves than a stranger for profit. Neuroimaging reveals that these moral preferences are associated with reduced sensitivity to profits in the striatum. Pharmacological studies show that serotonin and dopamine play distinct roles in shaping moral preferences. These findings have have implications for potential treatments of social dysfunction that is a common feature as well as a risk factor for many psychiatric disorders.