Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The ability to discriminate grating patterns, containing the same spatial frequency components but in different phase relationships, has been studied in infants by comparing looking times following habituation to one pattern. The performance of 1-month-olds was compared with that of 2/3-month-old infants. Both age groups could discriminate a set of components in square-wave-phase (fundamental 0.18 c/deg) from components of the same amplitude combined in random phase. However, these compounds differ in peak-to-trough contrast, which infants of both ages could discriminate even for a constant waveform. When contrast was randomized from presentation to presentation, the older group still demonstrated discrimination, implying that they were sensitive to the pattern differences, but the younger group did not. The younger group also failed to demonstrate discrimination between the two waveforms when they were of fixed, matched, peak-to-trough contrast, indicating that the previous absence of discrimination was not simply due to distraction by the contrast variations. We conclude that 1-month-olds are insensitive to the configuration of these compound grating patterns even when they are capable of detecting their components. This loss of spatial information has some analogies with adult peripheral and amblyopic vision. Like other aspects of vision, it shows striking development between 1 and 3 months of age.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Vision Res

Publication Date

1986

Volume

26

Pages

1223 - 1239

Keywords

Aging, Discrimination (Psychology), Form Perception, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Time Factors