Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

To test the domain-specificity of "theory of mind" abilities we compared the performance of a case-series of 11 brain-lesioned patients on a recently developed test of false belief reasoning () and on a matched false photograph task, which did not require belief reasoning and which addressed problems with existing false photograph methods. A strikingly similar pattern of performance was shown across the false belief and false photograph tests. Patients who were selectively impaired on false belief tasks were also impaired on false photograph tasks; patients spared on false belief tasks also showed preserved performance with false photographs. In some cases the impairment on false belief and false photograph tasks coincided with good performance on control tasks matched for executive demands. We discuss whether the patients have a domain-specific deficit in reasoning about representations common to both false belief and false photograph tasks.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.012

Type

Journal article

Journal

Cognition

Publication Date

05/2007

Volume

103

Pages

300 - 321

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Culture, Encephalitis, Herpes Simplex, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Nonverbal Communication, Psychological Theory, Severity of Illness Index, Social Perception, Stroke, Visual Perception