Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

Narrative representations of complex social networks in the performing arts are cognitively challenging, both for audiences and artists This has been recognised in recent scholarship, where expositions have focused on social networks in (for instance) realist fiction (Carroll et al., 2012), ancient and medieval epic (Mac Carron and Kenna, 2012), hyperlink cinema (Krems and Dunbar, 2013) and comic-book fiction (Carney et al., 2014). Here, we contribute to this important literature by way of a case study of Mozart’s opera The Marriage of Figaro, a rare combination of popular entertainment and intellectual complexity that has persisted as an audience favourite for nearly 230 years. We investigate the number and types of dyadic interactions in the libretto and analyse representations of the social network during the opera. Results show that the nine main characters of the opera are entangled in a social network that includes 36 different dyadic relationships pointing from one person to another. The entire social network, however, is never present or implied on stage simultaneously. The average number of persons singing or implied through a singing role at any specific time is 3.66 and seldom reaches above five. Only at the end of the second act, famous in history for challenging audiences to entertain several instances of dramatic tension, seven characters sing six separate parts simultaneously. We suggest that part of this opera’s enduring appeal is its narrative and structural solutions to representing complex and ecologically valid social interactions onstage, and call for comparative studies of how social behaviour is represented in the performing arts.



Book title

Evolutionary Approaches to Popular Culture

Publication Date