Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A central assumption that underpins much of the discussion of the role played by social cognition in brain evolution is that social cognition is unusually cognitively demanding. This assumption has never been tested. Here, we use a task in which participants read stories and then answered questions about the stories in a behavioural experiment (39 participants) and an fMRI experiment (17 participants) to show that mentalising requires more time for responses than factual memory of a matched complexity and also that higher orders of mentalising are disproportionately more demanding and require the recruitment of more neurons in brain regions known to be associated with theory of mind, including insula, posterior STS, temporal pole and cerebellum. These results have significant implications both for models of brain function and for models of brain evolution.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/scan/nsx034

Type

Journal article

Journal

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

Publication Date

01/07/2017

Volume

12

Pages

1063 - 1071

Keywords

fMRI, intentionality, mentalising, reaction time, social brain, Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Theory of Mind, Young Adult