Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Three studies investigated contingency learning and stereotype formation in a scenario about group membership and behavior with a confounding context factor. The studies tested predictions from theoretical accounts of biased group judgments in terms of simplistic reasoning, parallel distributed memory, and pseudocontingencies. Study 1 revealed a positive correlation between erroneous stereotype formation and learning of the true contingencies with the confounding factor. Study 2 showed that a focus manipulation during encoding moderated the correlation between stereotype formation and contingency learning but not the strength of the erroneous stereotype. Study 3 used a quasiexperimental comparison between participants with biased versus unbiased group judgments and extended the findings of a positive relation between stereotype formation and contingency learning. The results support an explanation of biased group judgments by pseudocontingencies; that is, unwarranted inferences from accurately perceived bivariate correlations in complex environments.

Original publication

DOI

10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.599

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Pers Soc Psychol

Publication Date

11/2004

Volume

87

Pages

599 - 614

Keywords

Adult, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Cognition, Humans, Judgment, Learning, Memory, Models, Psychological, Peer Group, Predictive Value of Tests, Prejudice, Social Behavior, Social Desirability, Social Perception, Stereotyping, Students