BA (Hons) PhD FBPS
Professor of Psychology & Affective Neuroscience
- Director of Oxford Centre for Emotions and Affective Neuroscience (OCEAN)
- ERC Advanced Investigator
- Fellow of University College
My work focuses on the nature of human emotions and why people react so differently to the good and the bad things in life.
My work focuses on the nature of human emotions and why there is such a wide variety of response to the same environmental situation.
Our approach is to examine the subtle cognitive biases that are linked to emotional vulnerability on the one hand, and human resilience and mental wellbeing on the other. These “biases” are the brain's natural tendencies to tune into the affective environment.
In the past, my team's work has confirmed that emotional vulnerability is associated with very specific biases to selectively process negative, relative to positive information. We have also found that certain genes that influence brain chemicals can affect how open people are to learning about the emotional environment around them.
We are now exploiting these earlier findings in order to deepen our understanding of why some people are emotionally fragile and others are resilient and experience optimal mental health. In a programme of research funded by the European Research Council - The CogBIAS project - we are investigating the cognitive and genetic mechanisms underpinning why some people flourish and others struggle.
We currently have no vacancies DPhil students.
Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion
FOX E., (2019), Brain and Neuroscience Advances
Psychological Science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive behavioural measurements
PARSONS SAM. et al, (2019), Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Attentional control, rumination and recurrence of depression
Figueroa CA. et al, (2019), Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 364 - 372
Mental Health in UK Biobank Revised
Davis KAS. et al, (2019)
A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.
Kruijt A-W. et al, (2019), J Abnorm Psychol, 128, 563 - 573