Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The study aimed to determine the utility of teacher ratings of children's behaviour, oral language, and literacy skills in identifying children with educational problems, and to examine the relationship between behaviour, oral language, and literacy skills. Teacher ratings were obtained for a cohort of Year 2 pupils (N = 129, mean age = 7.3 years, SD = .33) from five schools in Western Australia, using three brief screening questionnaires. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the screening instruments in identifying children with educational problems as determined by psychometric criteria, direct psychometric assessment of oral language, vocabulary, reading, and spelling was conducted for a subset of the children. Teacher ratings of language, literacy, and behaviour correlated significantly with the standardised test scores. The screening instruments for language and literacy had reasonable sensitivity (74%) and specificity (92%), but a fairly high rate of false negatives (26%) and relatively poor positive predictive power (.53) for identifying children with problems in language and/or literacy. The prevalence of marked behaviour problems in this Australian sample of school children (9.6%) was comparable to that found in previous studies. Brief teacher-based screening instruments appear to have the potential to provide an economical and effective approach for identifying children at risk for educational problems, but the current instruments lacked adequate precision The marked overlap between educational and behavioural problems in young children has important implications for prevention, identification, and intervention policies.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1080/00049530108255125

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2001-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

53

Pages

63 - 71

Total pages

8