Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Recent advances in intergroup contact research have drawn on methods from human geography to investigate how segregation shapes, and is shaped by, everyday intergroup experiences. Emerging findings suggest that the phenomena might be reciprocally intertwined, but empirical evidence is limited and mixed. This research tested the reciprocal relationship between everyday intergroup contact and segregation using ecological momentary assessment and GPS-GIS tracking in two segregated UK cities with youths aged 15-17. Study 1 (Belfast; nparticipants = 15; ninteractions = 115; nGPS-point = 633) focused on Catholics-Protestants divisions, and Study 2 (Bradford; nparticipants = 30; ninteractions = 334; nGPS-point = 2868) addressed ethnic segregation among Asian, White, and Black communities. In both studies, youths reported on social interactions throughout 6 days, while their urban mobility in outgroup spaces was tracked. In Belfast, more mixed districts predicted higher anxiety during intergroup interactions, yet, positive intergroup contact was followed by increased visits to outgroup spaces. In Bradford, mixed districts increased the likelihood (but not the quality) of intergroup contact, while the link between positive contact and subsequent outgroup space use was replicated. The findings highlight a virtuous cycle depending on contextual norms by which positive contact and desegregation practices might reinforce each other, arguably demonstrating the potential of intergroup contact for levelling urban divisions.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/bjso.70043

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

65

Keywords

GPS‐GIS analysis, ecological momentary assessment, everyday intergroup contact, socio‐spatial segregation, Humans, Adolescent, Male, Female, Geographic Information Systems, United Kingdom, Social Segregation, Cities, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Ethnicity, Group Processes, Interpersonal Relations