Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

When a conflict task involves congruent, neutral, and incongruent conditions, it is possible to examine facilitation (neutral vs. congruent) and interference (incongruent vs. neutral) components. Very few studies investigated the brain areas that are specifically involved in facilitation or interference. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants performed a magnitude conflict task (the size congruity paradigm). We observed four findings: (1) while most of the brain areas that were activated by conflict tasks showed interference effects, the intraparietal sulcus was the only region activated for both interference and facilitation components. (2) Two groups of participants could be distinguished based on the pattern of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activity, one with classical facilitation (congruent

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.025

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2008-10-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

46

Pages

2872 - 2879

Total pages

7

Keywords

Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Conflict, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mental Processes, Principal Component Analysis, Reaction Time, Reference Values