Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In pigmented rabbits anesthetized with N2O (70%) and halothane (2-4%), Purkinje cells were extracellularly recorded in the flocculus. A large central visual field (60 degrees x 60 degrees) was used to optokinetically stimulate either the ipsi- or contralateral eye, and the direction and velocity selectivities of complex spike responses were examined. For optokinetic stimulation (OKS) delivered to the ipsilateral eye (n = 129), the preferred direction was forward (F, n = 57) or upward (U, n = 37), while the remaining cells (n = 35) showed no response (N). For OKS delivered to the contralateral eye (n = 107), the preferred direction was backward (B, n = 11), downward (D, n = 42) or upward (U, n = 2), and the rest (n = 52) showed N. Cells tested with both eyes (n = 89) fell into five categories based on the preferred direction to ipsi- and contralateral OKS: (1) ipsi-F and contra-B (F/B type, n = 9), (2) ipsi-F but contra-N (F/N type, n = 28), (3) ipsi-U and contra-D (U/D type, n = 13), (4) ipsi-U but contra-N (U/N type, n = 17), and (5) ipsi-N but contra-D (N/D type, n = 22). The optimum velocity was within 0.1-2.0 degrees/s for all cells. On the average, the best response was obtained at 0.2-0.5 degrees/s stimulation. All ipsi-F cells responded to electrical stimulation of the optic tract (OT), while most cells preferring ipsi-U, contra-B and contra-D directions did not respond. No characteristic feature was found in cells innervated with collateralized climbing fiber branches to the nodulus. In the flocculus, cells preferring horizontal orientation (H cells, preferring ipsi-F and/or contra-B directions) were localized in a narrow dorsoventral zone (less than 1.0 mm) along the caudal border of the rostral one third, while those preferring the vertical orientation (V cells, preferring ipsi-U and/or contra-D directions) were in two distinct narrow zones located rostral and caudal to the H cell zone. H and V cells were intermingled in the central portion of the ventral flocculus. These four zones are in good agreement with previously defined H, anterior V, posterior V and R zones, respectively. The results indicate that the subdivision of the flocculus which controls horizontal (vertical) eye movements receives information regarding movements of the visual surround in the horizontal (vertical) orientation through visual climbing fiber afferents, thus being organized in olivo-cortico-nuclear functional units for control of eye movements.

Original publication

DOI

10.1007/BF00228151

Type

Journal article

Journal

Exp Brain Res

Publication Date

1990

Volume

80

Pages

225 - 237

Keywords

Action Potentials, Animals, Cerebellum, Electric Stimulation, Eye Movements, Form Perception, Motion Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Purkinje Cells, Rabbits, Vestibule, Labyrinth