Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Different accounts, experience-based theories and memory- based theories, have been put forward to understand better the patterns of human sentence processing and proved to be successful in many previous studies largely on European languages. However, sometimes they are not mutually exclusive, and at other times they make different predictions. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether they can be equally applied to other languages around the world. In this talk, I focus on such typologically unique sentences as relative clauses and topic structures in Chinese to present a test case for evaluating the two main schools of accounts. Generally, our results of the series of experiments are consistent with the predictions of experience-based theories, but with little supporting evidence for memory-based theories. We argue that more types of languages, especially typologically distinct structures with similar functions, should be taken into consideration to advance the study of language processing universals.