Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<p>Studies of cerebral lateralisation often involve participants completing a series of perceptual tasks under laboratory conditions. This has constrained the number of participants recruited in such studies. Online testing can allow for much larger sample sizes but limits the amount of experimental control that is feasible. Here we considered whether online testing could give valid and reliable results on four tasks: a rhyme decision visual half-field task, a dichotic listening task, a chimeric faces task, and a finger tapping task. We recruited 392 participants, oversampling left-handers, who completed the battery twice. Three of the tasks showed evidence of both validity and reliability, insofar as they showed hemispheric advantages in the expected direction and test-retest reliability of at least r= .75. The reliability of the rhyme decision task was less satisfactory (r= .63). We also found that left-handers were more likely to depart from typical lateralisation. Contrary to prediction, lateralisation across tasks was not significantly correlated. We conclude that three of the tasks, dichotic listening, chimeric faces and finger tapping, show considerable promise for online evaluation of cerebral lateralisation, but the results do not support the notion of a common underlying cause of lateralisation for the different cognitive tasks studied here.</p>

Original publication

DOI

10.31234/osf.io/sb824

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Publication Date

07/08/2020