Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This chapter discusses the relative advantages and disadvantages of distributed representations of source activity. After covering some theoretical considerations, it discusses how to apply the technique to event related fields and oscillatory activity in practice. The chapter makes the following points: (i) distributed representations of electrophysiological activity are typically done using current estimates and beam-forming techniques; (ii) distributed representations allow for spatial normalization and group averages; (iii) minimization constraints are applied when calculating distributed current estimates resulting in spatially smooth solutions; (iv) both event-related responses and oscillatory brain activity can be modeled by distributed current estimates; and (v) beam-forming approaches are best suited for longer lasting brain responses such as modulations of oscillatory activity.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307238.003.0007

Type

Chapter

Book title

MEG: An Introduction to Methods

Publication Date

01/09/2010

Pages

1 - 21