Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Previous studies have found that the P2 component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) increases after speech discrimination training. We compared electrophysiological and behavioral outcomes of individuals undergoing speech discrimination training (N = 8) with an untrained control group (N = 9). Significant improvements on the behavioral speech discrimination task were found only in the trained group; however, there were similar increases in P2 amplitude in both groups. Simple exposure to repeated instances of a speech sound during the ERP recording seems sufficient lead to enhancement of P2. This interpretation was bolstered by the finding of significant change in P2 during the first and second halves of the initial ERP recording, when listeners were not required to make any discriminative response. However, the largest change in P2 occurred between rather than within recording sessions, suggesting that the effects of exposure to a speech stimulus on ERPs may have a slow time-course and are most evident after a delay. Our data challenge the view that increased P2 amplitude reflects enhanced perceptual discrimination by auditory cortex.

Original publication




Journal article


Brain Res Cogn Brain Res

Publication Date





547 - 553


Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Threshold, Brain, Discrimination Learning, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Speech Perception, Time Factors