Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

It is often suggested that biological accounts of the cause of mental health problems are beneficial in health education initiatives. However, an alternative view is that the idea of a diseased brain may result in stigma and therapeutic pessimism in sufferers, professionals and the public with implications for the perception of unpredictability and risk. Anxious and depressed patients (n=49) were randomly allocated to three experimental conditions. Prior to watching a video of a person suffering from panic disorder, participants were told either that research indicated that panic was caused by biological factors, by psychological factors or the cause was unclear (control condition). Those in the biological condition were significantly more pessimistic about the patient's prospects for recovery and rated risks as higher compared to those in the psychological condition. The results call into question the widely accepted practice of promoting biological/disease explanations of mental health problems.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.005

Type

Journal article

Journal

Behav Res Ther

Publication Date

02/2007

Volume

45

Pages

405 - 411

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Panic Disorder, Prejudice, Prognosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, Social Perception, Time Factors, Violence